Stage 2 – Prove checklist
The Project Team should use Table 2 to ensure they undertake the required consultations and attain the required approvals to support the activities under Stage 2 – Prove of the Capital Framework.
Stage 2 – Prove checklist
No. | Stage 2 – Prove checklist | Yes |
|---|---|---|
| Project, Program or Precinct Business Case Mandatory for all Tiers but with differing levels of analysis |
|
2.1 | Has the Project Team consulted with key stakeholders (which includes iCBR, FABG, ICA, EFG and could include DDTS, TCCS, SLA, CRA, and other Agencies where relevant) throughout the development of the Business Case? | ☐ |
2.2 | Where relevant, has the Project Team ensured that Agencies with interrelated projects or whose works may potentially be affected are aware and involved in the project’s development as appropriate? | ☐ |
2.3 | Where the project, Program or Precinct involves a significant Information and Communications Technology (ICT), digital, and/or data component, has the Project Team consulted with relevant officials from Digital, Data and Technology Solution (DDTS) and the Agency’s Chief Information Officer (CIO)? | ☐ |
2.4 | Has the Project Team brought forward the benefits identified in the ILM, or any subsequently identified benefits, into the Needs Analysis? | ☐ |
2.5 | Has the Project Team sought advice from iCBR, FABG and ICA regarding the selected delivery model? | ☐ |
2.6 | Has the Project Team sought advice from FABG and ICA where anything is unclear, uncertain or unknown regarding the cost estimate? | ☐ |
2.7 | For all Tier 1 projects and for Tier 2 projects that are using a stochastic approach to risk quantification, has the Project Team ensured the stochastic quantification of contingency allowances have been reviewed by suitably qualified reviewers? | ☐ |
2.8 | Has the Project Team discussed the Economic Appraisal methodology, assumptions and results with EFG and ICA? | ☐ |
2.9 | Has the Project Team discussed the project timeline and cash flow with iCBR? | ☐ |
| Functional Design Brief Mandatory for all Tiers |
|
2.10 | If there is any uncertainty in relation to the content of the Functional Design Brief, has the Project Team consulted with iCBR? | ☐ |
| Benefits Realisation Plan (BRP) Mandatory for Tier 1, optional for Tier 2 and Tier 3 | |
2.11 | Has the Project Team brought forward the benefits identified in the ILM and the Needs Analysis? | ☐ |
2.12 | Have all of the KPIs followed the SMART principle? | ☐ |
2.13 | Is the number of individual KPIs manageable, so as not to impose an excessive administrative burden on the Project Team, Benefits Manager and Benefit Owners in monitoring performance against them? | ☐ |
2.14 | Has the Project Team allocated a Benefits Manager and Benefit Owners for all benefits identified? | ☐ |
2.15 | Has the Project Team provided the Benefits Register to key stakeholders for consideration? | ☐ |
2.15 | Has the Project Team received approval for the BRP and Benefits Register from the Project Sponsor and Benefits Manager? | ☐ |
Footnotes: